IPIP-HEXACO
Organization
A public-domain personality facet scoring engine
Instructions: For each statement, select the response that best describes how accurately it reflects your typical behavior and attitudes. There are no right or wrong answers. Respond as honestly as possible for the most informative academic baseline.
Scale: 1 = Very Inaccurate · 2 = Moderately Inaccurate · 3 = Neither · 4 = Moderately Accurate · 5 = Very Accurate
Your Organization Profile
IPIP-HEXACO · Ashton, Lee & Goldberg (2007) · Public Domain
Facet Interpretation
—
—
—
—
Academic Citation
Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The IPIP–HEXACO scales: An alternative, public-domain measure of the personality constructs in the HEXACO model. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 1515–1526. doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.02.003
About the IPIP-HEXACO Organization Scale (C-Orga)
The IPIP-HEXACO Organization scale (C:Orga) is a public-domain personality instrument from the International Personality Item Pool by Ashton, Lee, and Goldberg (2007). Organization is the first facet of the Conscientiousness dimension and measures the degree to which individuals maintain tidy environments, complete chores promptly, value order, and are bothered by untidiness and misplaced belongings.
Items symmetrically cover both high organization behaviors (keeping things tidy, doing chores right away, liking order) and low organization indicators (leaving messes, leaving belongings around, forgetting to replace items, comfort with disorganised environments). The alpha of .85 reflects strong internal consistency. Research has demonstrated specific predictive validity for Organization in workspace productivity, task completion rates, and academic performance in structured learning environments, with effects persisting after controlling for broad Conscientiousness.
Organization vs. NEO-PI-R Conscientiousness Order Facet: Key Differences
| Feature | IPIP-HEXACO Organization (C-Orga) | NEO-PI-R Conscientiousness Order Facet |
|---|---|---|
| Core Construct | Environmental tidiness & task completion | Orderliness within conscientiousness |
| Item Count | 10 items (IPIP-HEXACO) | 8 items (NEO-PI-R C:Order) |
| Access | Public domain — free any use | Proprietary (PAR) |
| Alpha Reliability | .85 (Ashton et al., 2007) | ~.80 (Costa & McCrae) |
Facet Position Within the HEXACO Model
The Organization facet (C-Orga) is one of four facets within the Conscientiousness (C) dimension of the six-factor HEXACO personality model developed by Michael Ashton and Kibeom Lee. Unlike the Big Five framework, HEXACO adds a sixth dimension — Honesty-Humility — capturing variance in sincere, fair, modest, and non-materialistic behavior that the five-factor model distributes across Agreeableness and Conscientiousness. The IPIP representation of this facet, developed in collaboration with Lewis Goldberg and the International Personality Item Pool project, provides researchers with an openly licensed operationalization that achieves internal consistency (alpha = .85) comparable to the proprietary HEXACO-PI-R while remaining entirely free for academic, organizational, and educational deployment.
Research and Applied Utility
Researchers and students in personality psychology, organizational behavior, and educational research regularly use the IPIP-HEXACO facet scales as targeted instruments for hypothesis testing, survey battery supplementation, and educational self-reflection activities. Because the IPIP scales are public domain, they may be embedded in any survey platform, online tool, or research system without licensing restrictions. The Organization (C-Orga) scale specifically provides a standardized academic baseline for the organization construct within the Conscientiousness domain, enabling comparison with published normative data from the Ashton, Lee, and Goldberg (2007) validation study. The scale has been applied in cross-cultural research across more than 35 countries, providing researchers with substantial normative reference material.
Frequently Asked Questions — Organization Scale (C-Orga)
Does being disorganised actually hurt academic performance, or is that a myth?
The research is fairly clear that physical and cognitive organisation independently predict academic performance, even after accounting for general intelligence and diligence. The mechanism is not that tidy rooms produce smart students — it is that externally organised environments reduce cognitive load, making mental resources available for higher-order tasks. People with lower organisation scores often spend more cognitive energy managing the friction of disorganised environments, leaving less available for the material itself.
Why do some highly intelligent, creative people live and work in apparent chaos?
Research on creative cognition offers a compelling explanation. Messy environments appear to promote associative thinking — the kind of loose, cross-domain connection-making that drives creative insight — while orderly environments promote analytical, rule-following thinking. Studies by Kathleen Vohs and colleagues show that people in messy environments generated more creative solutions to problems than those in tidy ones. This explains why some creative individuals who understand their own cognitive style deliberately resist imposed order.
Is the obsession with productivity apps and systems a sign of high or low organisation as a trait?
Paradoxically, research suggests the most intense consumers of productivity systems often have lower trait organisation scores — they are seeking external scaffolding to compensate for a naturally lower internal ordering tendency. Highly organised individuals tend to have fewer elaborate systems precisely because their environment stays manageable without them. If you are drawn to organisation systems, it means you are already motivated to address the gap — which is the most important first step.
Can a fundamentally disorganised person sustain a high-performing career long-term?
Consistently, yes — through compensatory strategies rather than trait change. Research on successful executives with low organisation profiles shows consistent patterns: excellent delegation of organisational tasks to structured team members, heavy reliance on external calendar and reminder systems, and deliberate design of work environments that impose structure externally. The strategy is environmental design rather than personality overhaul.
Does this organisation profile replace a formal executive functioning or cognitive assessment?
No. The IPIP-HEXACO Organisation scoring engine is a self-reflection worksheet for educational and academic baseline purposes only. It does not evaluate executive functioning, attention, or cognitive organisational capacity, and produces no formal conclusions about individual functioning or any learning or attentional concern. Formal evaluation of organisational capacity or executive functioning requires a qualified professional and appropriate validated instruments.