IPIP-HEXACO
Forgiveness
A public-domain personality facet scoring engine
Instructions: For each statement, select the response that best describes how accurately it reflects your typical behavior and attitudes. There are no right or wrong answers. Respond as honestly as possible for the most informative academic baseline.
Scale: 1 = Very Inaccurate · 2 = Moderately Inaccurate · 3 = Neither · 4 = Moderately Accurate · 5 = Very Accurate
Your Forgiveness Profile
IPIP-HEXACO · Ashton, Lee & Goldberg (2007) · Public Domain
Facet Interpretation
—
—
—
—
Academic Citation
Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The IPIP–HEXACO scales: An alternative, public-domain measure of the personality constructs in the HEXACO model. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 1515–1526. doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.02.003
About the IPIP-HEXACO Forgiveness Scale (A-Forg)
The IPIP-HEXACO Forgiveness scale (A:Forg) is a public-domain personality instrument from the International Personality Item Pool by Ashton, Lee, and Goldberg (2007). Forgiveness is the first facet of the Agreeableness dimension and measures the stable dispositional tendency to release resentment, forgive interpersonal offenses, and abstain from revenge — including the capacity to extend goodwill even to those who have wronged the individual.
The Forgiveness facet is unique within HEXACO Agreeableness in that it simultaneously taps active forgiveness disposition and interpersonal trust orientation, with both forgiveness-keyed and revenge/distrust-keyed items. This dual coverage ensures the scale captures both the positive (pardoning) and negative (grudging) poles of the forgiveness dimension. The alpha of .78 indicates solid reliability. Research demonstrates that Forgiveness independently predicts relationship reconciliation behavior, rumination frequency, and subjective well-being above and beyond general Agreeableness factor scores.
Forgiveness vs. Heartland Forgiveness Scale (HFS): Key Differences
| Feature | IPIP-HEXACO Forgiveness (A-Forg) | Heartland Forgiveness Scale (HFS) |
|---|---|---|
| Core Construct | Interpersonal forgiveness & trust | Forgiveness of self, others, and situations |
| Item Count | 10 items (IPIP-HEXACO) | 18 items (HFS) |
| Access | Public domain — free any use | Academic research use |
| Alpha Reliability | .78 (Ashton et al., 2007) | ~.87 (Thompson et al., 2005) |
Facet Position Within the HEXACO Model
The Forgiveness facet (A-Forg) is one of four facets within the Agreeableness (A) dimension of the six-factor HEXACO personality model developed by Michael Ashton and Kibeom Lee. Unlike the Big Five framework, HEXACO adds a sixth dimension — Honesty-Humility — capturing variance in sincere, fair, modest, and non-materialistic behavior that the five-factor model distributes across Agreeableness and Conscientiousness. The IPIP representation of this facet, developed in collaboration with Lewis Goldberg and the International Personality Item Pool project, provides researchers with an openly licensed operationalization that achieves internal consistency (alpha = .78) comparable to the proprietary HEXACO-PI-R while remaining entirely free for academic, organizational, and educational deployment.
Research and Applied Utility
Researchers and students in personality psychology, organizational behavior, and educational research regularly use the IPIP-HEXACO facet scales as targeted instruments for hypothesis testing, survey battery supplementation, and educational self-reflection activities. Because the IPIP scales are public domain, they may be embedded in any survey platform, online tool, or research system without licensing restrictions. The Forgiveness (A-Forg) scale specifically provides a standardized academic baseline for the forgiveness construct within the Agreeableness domain, enabling comparison with published normative data from the Ashton, Lee, and Goldberg (2007) validation study. The scale has been applied in cross-cultural research across more than 35 countries, providing researchers with substantial normative reference material.
Frequently Asked Questions — Forgiveness Scale (A-Forg)
Is forgiving someone the same as saying what they did was okay?
No — and this conflation is one of the biggest obstacles to forgiveness in psychological research. Forgiveness is defined in the literature as an internal process of releasing resentment and the motivation for revenge — it is about your own psychological state, not an endorsement of the offender's behaviour. You can fully forgive someone while also maintaining clear boundaries, choosing not to trust them again, or having nothing further to do with them. Forgiveness and reconciliation are different choices that do not require each other.
Why do some people seem genuinely incapable of letting go of grudges?
Research on this suggests several interacting factors. High trait rumination — the tendency to mentally revisit past events — makes grievances stickier by repeatedly reinforcing them in memory. Some individuals also hold implicit beliefs about forgiveness (that forgiving means condoning, or that maintaining anger protects them from re-injury) that function as psychological barriers. Attachment style matters too: anxiously attached individuals sometimes use grievance retention as an emotional proximity-keeping mechanism.
Does forgiving people easily mean you will just keep getting taken advantage of?
Research does not support this fear. High-forgiveness individuals do not show higher rates of victimisation in repeated-game economic studies — they show strong capacity to adjust trust calibration after offences even while forgiving emotionally. The key distinction is between unconditional behavioural reconciliation (which can invite exploitation) and emotional forgiveness (releasing resentment) paired with behavioural recalibration (adjusting trust levels appropriately). These can and usually are held simultaneously.
How does the inability to forgive affect physical health over time?
The psychophysiology here is well-documented. Sustained resentment and unresolved grudge-holding are consistently associated with elevated cortisol, higher resting cardiovascular reactivity, and immune suppression in longitudinal health research. The emotional cost of maintaining active grievance — even when the original offender is entirely unaware — falls entirely on the person carrying it. This is not a moral argument for forgiveness; it is a physiological one that makes the stakes concrete.
Does this forgiveness profile replace a formal conflict resolution or emotional processing evaluation?
No. The IPIP-HEXACO Forgiveness scoring engine is an educational self-reflection worksheet for academic and research baseline purposes only. It does not assess conflict resolution skills, emotional processing capacity, or interpersonal functioning, and produces no formal conclusions about individual psychological health. Formal evaluation of forgiveness, conflict, or grievance-related concerns requires a qualified professional and appropriate validated instruments.